Thursday, December 11, 2008

Freedom From Religion

Our Declaration of Independence asserts that all men are endowed with the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Most people will agree that the exercise of these rights must be limited to the extent that they deny or infringe on the rights of others. You are free to do as you please as long as it is not at the expense of someone else. At least this is what most of us profess. But is it what we practice?
Some would make a woman and her doctor criminals for aborting a pregnancy. Some think it is right that we have laws making a criminal of a woman for selling sexual favors, or of anyone who (1) plays cards for money, (2) smokes pot, or (3) uses cocaine. Some would have our public schools, school boards, county councils and Congress to conduct public prayer. Some would deny civil rights to gays and lesbians. Do any of these activities infringe on the rights of anyone else? If the motives for the above come from religious faith, then maybe Sam Harris is right. It is time for "the end of faith".
The imposition of a reference to "God" on our coins, currency and in the Pledge of Allegiance is a further indication of our unwillingness to see that any expression of religion made by government encroaches on the liberty of some, in violation of the Constitution. De we really think that believers have rights that non-believers do not have?

Labels: ,


At Friday, February 06, 2009 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your selective stance is consuming! To impose the opposing standpoint in itself is a bias leaning toward another's beliefs..

The argument of infringing or imposing one's rights is valid. However, philosophically one must ardously contend or distinguish right from wrong, truth from error which 'ought' to be far more the issue of substance here that reasoning to support a bias against a Diety, God and or Religion that is a futile pursuit.


Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home